Business India ×
  Magazine:
Editorial

Published on: Nov. 9, 2020, 8:39 a.m.
Too little, too late
  • Illustration: Panju Ganguli

By Business India Editorial

Bringing truant market participants to book and meting out punishment sufficient to deter other adventurous ones is one of the primary duties of the regulator. However, the speed at which malpractices are spotted and action taken is of the essence if the objective is to put the fear of God and the regulators in other participants. The capital market regulator, Securities and Exchange Board of India, does go after errant participants, but somehow it has failed, time and again, in bringing about the speedy closure of cases and meting out strong punishment.

There are several instances of inordinate lapses. The more notable ones being the case of Satyam and the action taken towards its auditor, Price Waterhouse. SEBI banned the audit firms from conducting audits for two years, nearly 10 years after the case came to light. The order was quashed by the appellate body on the grounds of non-jurisdiction. However, the point of inordinate delay in speedy delivery of punishment continues. 

The recent order passed in the Kirloskar case also smacks of the tardy action taken by the regulator. Nearly a decade after the alleged transactions of insider trading were spotted, the Securities and Exchange Board of India recently penalised Atul Kirloskar, Rahul Kirloskar and the other promoters of the listed entity Kirloskar Industries Ltd (KIL) for insider trading. The issue pertained to an alleged case of insider trading in which Kirloskar Brothers Ltd had offloaded 10.72 million shares of KBL of the value of Rs375 crore to a group company, Kirloskar Industries. 

Several irregularities/violations were noticed in the transaction, including the withholding of price sensitive information. The Kirloskars argued that the share purchase and sales were part of the arrangement to divide the businesses amongst Atul and Rahul on the one hand and Sanjay, on the other. This was part of the separation within the Kirloskar group.

Some of the directors were barred from trading for a six-month period. The promoters and family members of Kirloskar may appeal against SEBI’s order on the grounds of inordinate delay. While the Securities Appellate Tribunal may or may not set aside the penalty, the point is: can SEBI really take advantage of vague notifications which do not provide time limits for taking actions against errant promoters? Surely it cannot take 10 years to pass an order in an open and shut case as is made out by SEBI’s whole-time director. 

Insider trading is the most prominent stock market malpractice and any regulatory leniency will prove to be an ineffective deterrent for insider trading and fraudulent trades in India. 

SEBI has been issuing notices for violation by intermediaries, promoters and to investors after a gap of 10 to 12 years, It is not possible for either intermediary or investor to keep records for so long when the statutory requirement for keeping records is only eight years. If intermediary or investor do not give details then they are either debarred or fined heavily. There is little point in issuing such an order after so much time has elapsed. And the promoters may well have accessed the capital market during this interim period.

The Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) and Supreme Court have set aside many orders of SEBI for initiating action after 10-12 years. No effective purpose is served apart from gaining some headroom space in the daily financial papers. The order passed in this case, or in the case of Yash Birla, after 10 years, makes little sense.

It is true that in complicated cases of insider trading, bringing an errant participant to justice is difficult. In such cases SEBI is required to work closely with professionals, including lawyers who have expertise in crime and the ability to look at crimes in a holistic manner. US Regulators SEC also take the help of professionals in trying to book white collar criminals. SEBI should definitely take the help of independent investigators and not drag an insider case investigation indefinitely. Undue delay is cause for setting aside SEBI’s action by SAT. SAT had done so in cases in the past.

SEBI should impose some internal discipline and procedure and there should be a time limit within which the investigation should be done and orders issued. The order of SEBI in the Kirloskar case has interpreted Sec 11C which gives the regulator the powers to initiate action and take the necessary steps. The section is silent on the time limit and does not specify any timeframe for the completion of investigations. Surely SEBI cannot be given unfettered powers without any time limits to close investigations. The proposed new financial regulator overseeing all four financial regulators, needs to take a look at this aspect. If required, the relevant clause should be changed.

Don't miss this

Cover Feature

Spotting turnarounds

They provide good opportunities to smart investors; but hard work and a stomach for risk is essential to achieve alpha returns

Special Report

Government, social media companies at war

The government and the platforms are sticking to their own stands

Focus

Can Sitharaman save her budget?

As the second wave threatens growth targets, the government needs to step up its game

Corporate Report

Deepak Fertilisers gets future-ready

The company gears up for its next growth phase

Our letter to you, once a week.
Register with The CSR Weekly for free!

E-MAGAZINE
Turnarounds-the new mantra
BI 1100 Digital Stalin-a-moment-to-seize
BI 1099 digital-covid-hiding-the-pain
FROM THIS ISSUE

Startup

Retailing

Tourism

Tourism

Government

Government

Social Responsibility

Healthcare

Goodyear India partners Americares India Foundation

Published on Feb. 2, 2021, 9:21 p.m.

The partnership will support COVID-19 healthcare facilities in Faridabad and Aurangabad

Environment

Tata Motors launches a 'Go Green' initiative

Published on Dec. 23, 2020, 10:34 a.m.

The company will plant a sapling for the sale of every new commercial vehicle

Women Empowerment

Tata Starbucks ties up with Educate Girls to empower women

Published on Dec. 2, 2020, 3:10 p.m.

The partnership aims to provide volunteering and educational support to those who have relocated to urban cities from villages

Environment

Indian Oil has a social initiative for a clean and green world

Published on Nov. 25, 2020, 2:53 a.m.

The public sector company is planting a tree for every retail customer visit during its TreeCheers campaign period

Climate Change

Environment

Low maintenance, sustainable green spaces

Published on Feb. 4, 2021, 10:48 a.m.

The Center for Environment Concerns launches a pilot for greening road medians and urban areas

Energy

Husk Power uses rice husk to generate electricity in rural India

Published on Dec. 23, 2020, 9:32 a.m.

The company provides grid compatible and reliable power to customers

Energy

Smart Joules and energy saving solutions

Published on Nov. 17, 2020, 10:17 a.m.

The company's full-stack solution guarantees 15 per cent energy savings and zero upfront costs to the customer

Green Buildings

The GreenPro Ecolabel Standard for steel rebars will help a green built environment

Published on Nov. 5, 2020, 9:33 a.m.

Eight companies have already achieved CII’s Green Building Congress 2020 new standard

Stay ahead of the times.
Register with The Climate Change Weekly for free!